Review VPS from VPS.me

Review VPS from VPS.me – So today i will sharing about my experience using VPS from VPS.me

I am using VPS with this spesification:

CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
Number of cores : 2
CPU frequency : 1211.683 MHz
Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (2.7 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 1024 MB (82 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 256 MB (2 MB Used)
System uptime : 7 days, 4 hour 5 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
OS : Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab126.1

This VPS price is $9.95/mo. pretty expensive. Ok so lets start benchmark this vps using bench.sh

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run)   : 573 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run)   : 549 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run)   : 651 MB/s
Average I/O speed    : 591.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         12.0MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          9.89MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            4.23MB/s      
Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           7.64MB/s      
Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           8.24MB/s      
Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             3.71MB/s      
Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           11.7MB/s      
Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          11.3MB/s      
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            7.63MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           4.55MB/s      
Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          7.26MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name                       IPv6 address            Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA             2600:3c02::4b           12.1MB/s      
Linode, Dallas, TX              2600:3c00::4b           11.9MB/s      
Linode, Newark, NJ              2600:3c03::4b           11.9MB/s      
Linode, Singapore, SG           2400:8901::4b           4.82MB/s      
Linode, Tokyo, JP               2400:8900::4b           9.21MB/s      
Softlayer, San Jose, CA         2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4    11.2MB/s      
Softlayer, Washington, WA       2607:f0d0:3001:78::2    11.9MB/s      
Softlayer, Paris, FR            2a03:8180:1301:8::4     9.63MB/s      
Softlayer, Singapore, SG        2401:c900:1101:8::2     3.92MB/s      
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP            2401:c900:1001:16::4    6.99MB/s      
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Now using Nench

Disks:

CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    3.883 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    6.670 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    3.480 seconds

ioping: seek rate
    min/avg/max/mdev = 104.9 us / 131.2 us / 66.3 ms / 594.3 us
ioping: sequential read speed
    generated 7.67 k requests in 5.00 s, 1.87 GiB, 1.53 k iops, 383.6 MiB/s

dd: sequential write speed
    1st run:    679.02 MiB/s
    2nd run:    885.96 MiB/s
    3rd run:    756.26 MiB/s
    average:    773.75 MiB/s

IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4:    93.188.163.xxxx

    Cachefly CDN:         11.95 MiB/s
    Leaseweb (NL):        8.39 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US):   4.77 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR):      7.69 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA):         10.03 MiB/s

IPv6 speedtests
    your IPv6:    2a02:4780:1:xxxx

    Leaseweb (NL):        8.27 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US):   4.09 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR):      8.37 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA):         11.52 MiB/s

And now benchmark the CPU using GeekBench.

Not bad..

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/6588209

Above the average.

Conclusion

The performance of this VPS is good, at the price. For uptime problem I think all VPS providers are professional now. It could be an option for those who want to use VPSme for production server.

Shares

Leave a Reply